Sardines hit hard by overfishing

first_imgIt may seem like sardines are, well, packed like sardines in the ocean—the tiny fish travel in schools of millions. But they and other small forage fish like herring and anchovies aren’t immune to the effects of commercial fishing. A new study looks at seven species over 25 years and finds that overfishing exacerbates natural boom-and-bust cycles of the fish, which are not only a food source for humans but for countless larger marine animals.The study “is a thought-provoking piece of work” says Jason Link, a fisheries scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Woods Hole, Massachusetts. And it strengthens the case that forage fish deserve more protection, he adds.There’s no mystery about the status of tuna and other large predators; many of these stocks are clearly overfished. But it’s harder to know the impact of fishing on forage fish populations. That’s because populations of these small fish naturally alternate between abundant and scarce. Whether commercial fishing makes the collapses more frequent, prolonged, or severe has been hard to pin down. “There was this notion that … fishing doesn’t really matter,” says ecologist Timothy Essington of the University of Washington, Seattle. Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Emailcenter_img Essington and his colleagues turned to stock assessments—regular surveys of fish populations that are collected by both commercial fisheries and research vessels. They analyzed 55 stocks from around the world of seven forage fish species, which had been tracked for at least 25 years. Then they used the stock assessments to not only calculate the overall fish populations, but also local fishing rates—how much of a fish population was being caught at a given time. When fishing rates were high, the scientists found, populations collapsed to levels six times lower than they would have been otherwise. The collapses weren’t more frequent, however, the team reports online today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.This highlights a problem in fishery management: “We usually increase fishing at exactly the same time the population is struggling,” Essington says. Because the forage fish tend to congregate in large schools, it remains easy for fishermen to catch many fish at once; but as populations decline, one school can be a larger fraction of the total population. “But the problem is that once you get to these lower abundances, you end up in this really risky zone.”Using the new data set, Essington and his colleagues also developed a simulation to explore the risk. If fishing is halted when populations start to decline, forage fish remain plentiful, the models show. “If you just turn off all fishing and let the populations do what they would have done naturally, most of them will completely recover within a few years,” Essington says, suggesting a time frame that fishing bans might be enforced for.That makes sense. “In general terms, limited harvest when populations are low is wise,” Link says. But before fishing restrictions could be put in place, more research is needed on exactly what the cutoff for each fish species would be, and how long a restriction will let the fish recover, he notes.Climate change makes the problem even tougher. “It’s an excellent study, but the large omission here is that of climate, and we know that climate drives the dynamics of many of the stocks that they studied,” says David Checkley of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, California, who was not involved in the new work. To keep forage fish abundant, the role of both climate change and commercial fishing will need to be teased out so the populations can be protected from both, he says.*Correction, 9 April, 5:25 p.m.: The original image that accompanied this story was not one of sardines, as indicated. We have replaced the image. Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*)last_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *